Presence in the Age of AI
AI can analyze conversations and reveal participation patterns. But leaders still need presence to interpret context, trust, power, and risk — and to turn shared contribution into better decisions.
The meeting ends. You presented the numbers. Clear, precise
But it’s not your idea that holds the room’s attention.
Five minutes later, a colleague reframes it — almost word for word.
And he’s the one who gets the nods, the support, the next steps.
Walking out, you wonder:
Did I choose the wrong words? Was it the wrong moment? Did I miss something obvious?
You didn’t miss anything.
You just stepped into what I sometimes call, half-jokingly, a parallel dimension: informal power dynamics. An unmapped space that still determines who gets heard, recognized, or left out.
Workplace politics gets a bad name.
But underneath, it’s interpersonal mechanics: how influence builds, how decisions actually get made, how alliances form.
In an intercultural setting, all of this gets harder to read. Who speaks first. Who’s allowed to bring a solution. How an idea is meant to travel before it gets approved.
In some cultures, an idea has to be picked up by someone in authority before it becomes actionable — an unwritten norm that can feel like exclusion if you don’t see it coming. In others, fast, almost chaotic exchanges are valued over keeping track of who said what.
These implicit norms filter who gets heard, and how — the same filter that turned your idea into someone else’s.
Before deciding who’s right, notice what’s actually happening. A silence that lasts a beat too long. A reframed idea that changes hands without changing content. A decision made over coffee rather than in the room.
These aren’t noise. They’re where power actually moves.
The more present you are at this level, the less you react on autopilot — and the more your choices stay aligned with what you actually want to defend.
In a multicultural setting, the rules are rarely written down. Anyone who learned them elsewhere treats them as self-evident; everyone else is left guessing.
Courage here isn’t confrontation.
It’s the plain question, asked at the right moment:
I noticed this idea changed hands between when I raised it and when it got approved. Is it about timing, or how this team works? Can you help me understand how to read this?
A factual observation, without blame, paired with a clear request, is often enough to shift a dynamic that looked fixed.
Leadership doesn’t only show up in the big decisions.
It shows up in the in-between moments: a silence after an idea, a hallway conversation, a follow-up email.
Inclusive leaders notice these dynamics with Presence. They name them with Courage.
It’s not about playing a role. It’s about being fully there, taking conscious action, and bringing clarity where the rules stay unwritten.
AI can analyze conversations and reveal participation patterns. But leaders still need presence to interpret context, trust, power, and risk — and to turn shared contribution into better decisions.
Working with colleagues from diverse cultural backgrounds can bring unique perspectives and communication challenges. Active listening is crucial in overcoming these obstacles. Here are eight techniques for improving active listening.
Journaling empowers inclusive leaders by fostering self-reflection, emotional intelligence, and cultural agility. Through regular writing, leaders gain insights into biases, enhance decision-making, and create inclusive environments. It transforms their approach, leading to positive organizational change and a culture of respect and collaboration.